Reinforcement of Obedience within Architecture: Nescient Submission of Designers & Control Maintaining Spaces

Nescient Submission of Designers & Control Maintaining Spaces

Authors

  • Naomi - Inaam Shamma Faculty of Architecture and Design, Girne American University, North Cyprus
  • Shahin Keynoush Faculty of Architecture and Design, Girne American University, North Cyprus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2024.21.02.1255-se

Keywords:

obedience, norm, submission, imprisonment, Built environment, architecture

Abstract

Civilizations are in a constant state of change in which different identifiers of what is considered to be normal or acceptable are recognized. That questions the understanding of human perception of the “norm”. This triggers the question of obedience; people obey based on the norms provided for them to abide by. How could one remain aware of their obedience while identifying limits that secure them from nescient submission? As civilizations shape the norms of a society, designers that contribute to building it, obey the laws they have been passed on that require the creation of “control maintaining spaces”, providing reinforced obedience. This research recognizes the element of reinforced obedience through the criteria of imprisonment phenomenology, and suggests ways to avoid subconscious incentivization of nescient submission. It aims to provide awareness to a pre-existing phenomenon of obedience reinforcement through the imprisonment phenomenon occurring expansively within the built environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bissell, W.C. (2011). Urban Design, Chaos, and Colonial Power in Zanzibar. Indiana University Press.

Boyer, C. B. (2008). The Many Mirrors of Foucault and their Architectural Reflections. In L. De Cauter & M. Dehaene (Ed.), Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society, (pp. 53- 73). Taylor & Francis e-Library.

De Cauter. L, & Dehaene, M. (2008). The Space of Play: Towards a General Theory of Heterotopia. In L. De Cauter & M. Dehaene (Ed.), Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society, (pp. 87- 102). Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Faubion, J. D. (2008). Heterotoppia: An Ecology. In L. De Cauter & M. Dehaene (Ed.), Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society, (pp. 31- 39). Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason (R. Howard, Trans.). Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and Civilisation. Tavistock.

Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.2307/464648

Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1975). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Gallimard.

Guardian News and Media. (2017, November 6). Hitler’s holiday camp: How the sprawling resort of Prora met a truly modern fate. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/nov/06/hitler-holiday-camp-prora-nazi-development

Gros, F. (2017). Disobey! (J. Howe, Trans.). Verso Books.

Kant, I. (1960). Reflections on education: With special reference to the teaching of English in the upper forms of schools. Manchester University Press.

King, A, D. (1990). Urbanism, Colonialism and the World-Economy. Routledge

Le Corbusier. (1929). The City of Tomorrow and Its Planning. Payson & Clarke Ltd.

Petti, A. (2008). Dubai Offshore Urbanism. In L. De Cauter & M. Dehaene (Ed.), Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society, (pp. 287- 295). Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Rykwert, J. (1988). The Idea of a Town: The Anthropology of Urban form in Rome, Italy, and the Ancient World. MIT Press.

Sanchez, G. H. (2019, January 27). These pictures show The barbaric inhumanity of auschwitz concentration camp. BuzzFeed News. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/gabrielsanchez/holocaust-remembrance-day-photos-auschwitz-birkenau

Shamma, N. & Keynoush, S. (2023). Prison as a Mirror: The Reflection of the Prison Concept & The Re-Evaluation of the Built Environment. doi: https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA2023EN4122

Shamma, N. & Keynoush, S. (2023). Prison Concept as a Heterotopia. In R. Rahbarianyazd (Ed.), Contemporary Approaches in Urbanism and Heritage Studies, (pp. 100-110) Cinius Yayınları, DOI: https://doi.org/10.38027/ICCAUA20230372ch8

Sohn. H. (2008). Heterotopia: anamnesis of a medical term. In L. De Cauter & M. Dehaene (Ed.), Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society, (pp. 41- 50). Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. Bantam Books.

Towers, G. (2005). An introduction to urban housing design: At home in the city. Taylor & Francis.

Trachtenberg, M., & Hyman, I. H. (1986). Architecture: From Prehistory to Postmodernity.

Vitruvius Pollio, M. H. Morgan, Herbert Langford (1914). Vitruvius: Ten Books on Architecture. Harvard University Press.

Zevi, B. (1978). The modern language of architecture. The University of Washington Press.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2024

How to Cite

[1]
N. .-. I. Shamma and S. Keynoush, “Reinforcement of Obedience within Architecture: Nescient Submission of Designers & Control Maintaining Spaces: Nescient Submission of Designers & Control Maintaining Spaces”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 152–170, Dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)