HAS THE DEVELOPMENT OF EEZ ACHIEVED ITS AIMS?

Authors

  • M. Belal Hossain Department of Fisheries and Marine Science, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Sonapur, Noakhali 3802, Bangladesh
  • M. Mostafa Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline (FMRT), Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2010.10.1and2.1006-L

Keywords:

EEZ, ocean resources, sustainable use, achievements

Abstract

The Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) concept is the prime and important invention of the Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) in 1982. It was designed to secure coastal state control over the resources within the area with a view to solve the conflicting claims of territorial sea, to ensure fair share of the resources and ultimately to use and manage the ocean resources in a sustainable manner. The concept is a reflection of developing states’ aspiration, but in reality the main beneficiaries are the rich and developed states. The biggest losers of all are the land-locked and geographically disadvantaged states, which either cannot have an EEZ or their claims, are of little economic significance, considering the width of their EEZs or the resources therein. Still there are many unresolved issues and problems concerning the EEZ regime such as overlapping claims, conflicting use of navigation and fishing, unattributed rights, access to surplus stocks, over-fishing and marine pollution. The rules of the EEZ have not yet fully implemented by all parties. Therefore, it cannot be considered a finished treatment of controlling this important area and it should be supplemented by other agreements and regional co-operations like UN Fish Stock Agreement and International Maritime Organization (IMO)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anand, R.P. 1983. Origin and Development of the Law of the Sea: History of International Law Revisited. Martinus Nijhof Publishers

Anon. 1992. The law of the sea: national claims to maritime jurisdiction. United Nations office for ocean affairs and the law of the sea, New York

Anon. 2000. Limits in the seas. No. 36, Office of the Ocean Affairs, USA

Anon. 2007. State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture: Part 3. Highlights of Special FAO Studies, The Economic Viability of Marine Capture Fisheries, available on http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/ X8002E/ x8002e06.htm#P5 (site visited on 20 April 2007)

Aqorau, T. 2000. Illegal Fishing and fisheries law enforcement in small Island developing states: The pacific Island experience. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 15: 137-64

Attard, D.J. 1987. The exclusive economic zone in international law. Claendon press, oxford

Bernaerts, A. 1988. Bernaerts guide to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Fairplay Publications

Birnie, P. and Boyle, A. 2002. International Law and the Environment.

Brown, E.D. and Churchill, R.R. 1987. The UN convention on the law of the sea: impact and implementation. University of Hawaii, USA

Churchill, R.R. and Low, A.V. 1999. The law of the sea. Juris Publishing, Manchester University Press

Dahmani, M. 1987. The fisheries regime of the exclusive economic zone. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

David, R.S. and Digeser, P. 1990. The United States and the law of the sea treaty. Johns Hopkins University, Washington D.C.

Shyam, M. 1982. The new international economic order and the new regime for fisheries management. Ocean Management 8: 568-582

Tanja, G.J. 1990. The legal determination of international maritime boundaries. Kluwer Publishers, The Hague

Vicuna, F.O. 1989. The exclusive economic zone. Cambridge University Press, UK

Downloads

Published

25-11-2010

How to Cite

[1]
M. B. . Hossain and M. . Mostafa, “HAS THE DEVELOPMENT OF EEZ ACHIEVED ITS AIMS?”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 217–222, Nov. 2010.

Issue

Section

Management and Business Studies

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.