A STUDY ON STUDENT MOTIVATION AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL

Authors

  • Mustafa Kamal Department of Development Studies, Dhaka University, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
  • Gazi Abdullah-hel Baqui Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2013.11and12.1208-S

Keywords:

Student motivation, university life, qualitative study, goal orientation, academic tasks, interventions

Abstract

The present paper explores how student motivation changes over time at university level based on the students’ perspectives. A purposive sample of nine students was interviewed from the Economics Discipline of Khulna University. The paper reveals that the loss of motivation can occur at any stage of a student’s university life: some may start university with low motivation, yet others may be caught in it at the middle stage or even at the very end. While a small number of students sustain good motivation level throughout their student life, most students experience some swings between high motivation and low motivation and majority of them tend to end the university life with a frustrated mindset. It is also found that some factors play a positive role and can drive a number of students more to academic tasks. In addition to providing insights and explanations about what factors work behind to shape the motivation level of students at the university, the present paper reveals how the provision of certain interventions is related to them and thus relevant to the existing setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernard, H. R. 2006. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. AltaMira Press, Oxford, UK.

Covington, M. C. 1999. Caring about learning: The nature and nurturing of subject-matter appreciation. Educational Psychologists, 34(2): 127–136.

Deci, E. L.; Vallerand, R.J.; Pelletier, L. G. and Ryan, R. M. 1991. Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4): 325–346.

Deci, E. L.; Koestner, R. and Ryan, R. M. 2001. Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1): 1–27.

Martin, A. J.; Marsh, H. W.; Williamson, A. and Debus, R. L. 2003. Self-handicapping, defensive pessimism, and goal orientation: A qualitative study of university students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3): 617–628.

Moè, A.; Pazzaglia, F.; Tressoldi, P. and Toso, C. 2009. Attitude towards School, Motivation, Emotions and Academic Achievement. pp. 259–274. In: Larson, J. E. (ed.),Educational psychology: Cognition and Learning, Individual Differences and Motivation. Nova Science Publisher, New York.

Müller, F. H. and Palekčić, M. 2005. Continuity of motivation in higher education: A three-year follow-up study. Review of Psychology, 12(1): 31–43.

Neuman, W. L. 2007. Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. 2nd edition, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

Pintrich, P. R. 2003. Motivation and classroom learning. pp. 103–122. In: Reynolds, W. M. and Miller, G. E. (eds.), Handbook of psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.

Pressley, M.; Roehrig, A. D.; Raphael, L.; Dolezal, S.; Bohn, C.; Mohan, L.; Wharton-McDonald, R.; Bogner, K. and Hogan K. 2003. Teaching processes in elementary and secondary education. pp. 153–175. In: Reynolds, W. M. and Miller, G. E. (eds.), Handbook of psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.

Russel, B. 2010. Education and the Social Order. Routledge, New York.

Downloads

Published

29-11-2013

How to Cite

[1]
M. . Kamal and G. A.- hel . Baqui, “A STUDY ON STUDENT MOTIVATION AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 203–212, Nov. 2013.

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.