HYBRIDIZATION OF ROHU (LABEO ROHITA) AND BATA (LABEO BATA) AND GROWTH COMPARISON OF THE HYBRID WITH ROHU

Authors

  • Md. Saifuddin Shah Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Alokesh Kumar Ghosh Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Md. Ashkar Bin Sayeed Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Atal Saha Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Md. Awlad Hossain Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Gazi Sipar Hossain Fisheries and Marine Resource Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2008.9.2.0808-L

Keywords:

Hybridization, Labeo rohita, Labeo bata

Abstract

A sixty-day study was carried out to compare the growth of hybrid between Labeo rohita (rohu) and Labeo bata (bata) with one of the parental species, rohu. The fertilization and hatching rates found to be lower in hybrid than those in rohu. After three days of hatching the spawns were reared in earthen nursery ponds for sixty days. The growth in weight for the first ten days and, in weight and length for the following fifty days were obtained and compared with those of rohu and significant difference in the rates of growth were observed. The hybrid showed faster growth rate than the parental species, rohu. The results obtained could be considered as preliminary finding in rohu x bata hybridization and needs further work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anon. 2004. Fishery Statistical Year book of Bangladesh, 2003-2004. Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Basavaraju, Y.; Devaraj, K.V. and Ayyar, S.P. 1995. Comparative growth of reciprocal carp, hybrids, Catla catla and Labeo fimbriatus. Aquaculture, 129: 187-191.

Chappel, J.A. 1979. An evaluation of twelve genetic groups of catfish for suitability in commercial production. Ph.D. Thesis, Auburn University, USA, 208 pp.

Chaudhuri, S.N. 1999. Quality control of hatchery produced fry. In: Fish Week ‘99 Compendium. Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. 21-25. (in Bengali).

Das, P.; Kumar, D.; Ghosh, A.K. and Bhowmick, U. 1980. A preliminary observation on the performance of catla-rohu hybrid in carp culture. Food Farming and Agriculture 12(12):249-296.

Dunham, R.A. and Smitherman, R.O. 1986. Genetics and breeding. pp. 283-316. In: Tucker, C.S. (ed). Channel Catfish Culture. Elsevier Scientific Publishing, Amsterdam.

Dunham, R.A.; Majumdar, K.; Hallerman, E.; Bartley, D.; Mair, G.; Hulata, G.; Liu, Z.; Pongthana, N.; Bakos, J.; Penman, D.; Gupta, M.; Rothlisberg, P. and Hoerstgen¬ Schwark, G. 2001. Review of the status of aquaculture genetics. pp. 137-166. In: Subasinghe, R.P.; Bueno, P.; Phillips, M.J.; Hough, C.; McGladery, S.E. and Arthur, J.R. (eds.), Aquaculture in the Third Millennium. Technical Proceedings of the Conference on Aquaculture in the Third Mellennium, Bangkok, 20-25 February 2000, NACA, Bangkok and FAO, Rome.

Eknath, A.E. and Doyle, R.W. 1985a. Maximum likelihood estimation of “unobservable” growth and development rates using scale data: application to crop aquaculture in India. Aquaculture, 49: 55-71.

Eknath, A.E. and Doyle, R.W. 1985b. Indirect selection for growth and life history traits in Indian carps aquaculture. Aquaculture, 49: 73-84.

Hooe, M.L.; Buck, D.H. and Wahl, D.H. 1994. Growth, survival, and recruitment of hybrid crappies stocked in small impoundments. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 14: 137-142.

Hussain, M.G. and Mazid, M.A. 1999a. Present status of aquaculture genetic research in Bangladesh. Fifth INGA Steering Committee Meeting, 3-5 March 1999, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 21 pp.

Hussain, M.G. and Mazid, M.A. 1999b. Broodstock management status and some suggestion to control negative selection and inbreeding in hatchery stocks in Bangladesh. NAGA, the ICLARM Quarterly, 22: 24-27.

Ibrahim, K.H. 1977. Contribution to hybridization among Indian carps. Study on the biology and morphological features of some Indian carp hybrids. Ph.D. thesis, Utkal University, India.

Islam, M.R. and Shah, M.S. 2007. Positive heterosis in F1 hybrid of rohu (Labeo rohita) strains from Jamuna river and a local hatchery from Jessore, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Zoology, 35(1): 131-139.

Khan, H.A.; Gupta, S.D.; Reddy, P.V.G.K. Tantia, M.S. and Kowtal, G.V. 1990. Production of sterile intergeneric hybrids and their utility in aquaculture and stocking. pp. 41-48. In: Keshavanath, P. (ed.) Asian Fish Society. Specific Publication No. 2. Mangalore, India.

Kowtal, G.V. 1987. Hybridization amongst indigenous and exotic carps on India. In: Tiews, K. (ed.), Selection, Hybridization and Genetic Engineering in Aquaculture, Vol. 2, Berlin. pp. 91-100.

Moav, R.; Brody, T.; Wohlfarth, G., and Hulata, G. 1979. A proposal for the continuous

production of F1 hybrids between the European and Chinese races of the common crap in traditional fish farms of Southeast Asia. In: Pillay T.V.R. and Dill W.A. (eds.) Advances in Aquaculture. Fishing New Books, Farnham, Surrey, England.

Shah, M.S. 2004. Management and Improvement of Hatchery and Broodstocks of Indian Major Carps, Rohu, Labeo rohita, Mrigal, Cirrhina mrigala and Catla, Catla catla. SUFER project report, DFID- UGC, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Tave, D. 1993. Genetics for fish hatchery managers, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, 2-6 Boundary Row, London, SEI 8HN, England. Pp 71-108.

Yan, S.Y. and Ozgunen, T. 1993. Fish breeding and biotechnology. Journal of Islamic Academical Science, 6(3): 121-129.

Downloads

Published

23-11-2008

How to Cite

[1]
M. S. . Shah, A. K. . Ghosh, M. A. B. . Sayeed, A. . Saha, M. A. . Hossain, and G. S. . Hossain, “HYBRIDIZATION OF ROHU (LABEO ROHITA) AND BATA (LABEO BATA) AND GROWTH COMPARISON OF THE HYBRID WITH ROHU”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 215–220, Nov. 2008.

Issue

Section

Life Science

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>