ECONOMIC POTENTIALS OF RUBBER (Hevea brasiliensis) MONOCULTURE AND RUBBER-AGROFORESTRY SYSTEM: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHERN BANGLADESH

Authors

  • M. G. Rakkibu Forestry and Wood Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
  • M. A. Kyser Forestry and Wood Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
  • R. Rana Forestry and Wood Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2003.5.1.0331-L

Keywords:

Rubber-Agroforestry; Rubber-Monoculture; Financial Analysis.

Abstract

A financial analysis of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation was made in February 2003 to determine economic profitability of rubber monoculture and rubber-agroforestry system in a rubber plantation of Sherpur district of Bangladesh. Rubber was intercropped with ginger (Zingiber officinale), turmeric (Curcuma longa), paddy (Oryza sativa), eggplant (Solanum melongena), different types of vegetables and fruits. Output was calculated on the basis of present market price. Financial indicators used were Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR).  Level of profit was determined at the 15th year of the economic life of the plantings while average profit was increasing. Using 6% nominal interest rate NPV was found to be Taka 57751 for rubber-agroforestry and Taka -78043 (negative) for monoculture of rubber, IRR was 9% for rubber-agroforestry and -12% (negative) for monoculture and BCR was 1.43 for rubber-agroforestry and 0.22 for monoculture. Higher profit in rubber plantation can be achieved by practicing agroforestry. Agroforestry practice in rubber gardens has great potential in terms of profitability and enhanced environmental amelioration. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anon, 1991. Environmental Assessment Source Book. Washington: The World Bank, Vol-1, 138 pp.

Gittinger, J.P., 1974. Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 98 pp.

Juriprik, S., 1996. Thailand Case Study: Rubber Intercropping Rubber Smallholders Community Development Project an Ecological and Self-Reliant New Alternative. A paper for the “Monocultures: Environmental and Social Effects and Sustainable Alternatives” Conference.

Sattar, M.A., 1995. Utilization of Rubber Wood: A Timber from Non-Conventional Source. Bangladesh Journal of Forest Science. 24(1): 2 pp.

Sutardi, 1976. Profitability of Rubber Estates in Java. Rubber Research Centre, Getas, Salatiga, Indonesia. Menara-Perkebunan. 44(1): pp. 11-27.

Wojtkowski, P.A., 1998. The Theory and Practice of Agroforestry Design. Vijay Primlani for Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. 66, Janpath, New Delhi 110 001. 22 pp.

Young, A., 1997. Agroforestry for Soil Management. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon OX108DE, UK. 57 pp.

Downloads

Published

27-05-2003

How to Cite

[1]
M. G. . Rakkibu, M. A. . . Kyser, and R. . Rana, “ECONOMIC POTENTIALS OF RUBBER (Hevea brasiliensis) MONOCULTURE AND RUBBER-AGROFORESTRY SYSTEM: A CASE STUDY OF NORTHERN BANGLADESH”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 7–9, May 2003.

Issue

Section

Life Science

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.