EXPLORING IMPACTS OF URBAN DENSITY ON TRAVEL BEHAVIOR IN KHULNA CITY, BANGLADESH USING SPATIAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Md Sohel Rana Urban and Rural Planning Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
  • Mostaq Ahmed Urban and Rural Planning Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2022.19.02.2141-se

Abstract

Urban density not only represents the intensity of travel demand, but also serves as a useful tool for quantifying the elements that influence travel behavior and demand. In this study, Khulna City of Bangladesh has been selected as a case study to explore the impacts of urban density on travel behavior in a city of a developing country. The average characteristics of urban density, as well as their impacts on travel behavior and demand, have been studied using geospatial analysis techniques. Urban densities have been categorized into Single Density (Population Density, Employment Density, and Building Density) and Composite Density (Household to Work trip Density, Household to School trip Density and Household to Shop trip Density) based on characteristics of travel behavior and demand. Descriptive statistics have been used to explore the impacts of urban densities on the various trip characteristics such as trip production, trip distance, trip cost, trip time, and trip mode. Diversity of trips and overall trip attraction areas have been identified using the Shannon diversity index and other spatial analyses. Trip production, trip distance, trip time, trip cost, and mode choice all show a positive linear relationship with urban single-density, according to this study. The everyday activities of residents are closely related to urban composite densities, and trip production increase in tandem with composite densities. It has been concluded that different urban densities have significant impacts on travel demand and travel behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilera, A. (2008). Business travel and mobile workers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(8), 1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.005

Bhadra, S., & Sazid, A. K. M. T. (2015). A GIS Based Walkability Measurement within the Built Environment of Khulna City, Bangladesh. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312589637_A_GIS_Based_Walkability_Measurement_within_the_Built_Environment_of_Khulna_City_Bangladesh

Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6

Curtis, C., & Perkins, T. (2006). Travel behaviour: A review of recent literature (Library resource). European Institute for Gender Equality. https://eige.europa.eu/library/resource/AMZ_NET7576

Domencich, T., & McFadden, D. (1975). Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~mcfadden/travel.html

Ewers, H.-J. (1995). The Locational Impact of Declining Costs of Transportation and Communication. In H. Giersch (Ed.), Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth (pp. 183–195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79397-4_8

Hanaoka, K., Nakaya, T., Yano, K., & Inoue, S. (2014). Network-based spatial interpolation of commuting trajectories: Application of a university commuting management project in Kyoto, Japan. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.006

Hsieh, S., O’Leary, J. T., & Morrison, A. M. (1992). Segmenting the international travel market by activity. Tourism Management, 13(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(92)90062-C

Kockelman, K. M. (1997). Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area: Transportation Research Record. https://doi.org/10.3141/1607-16

Lin, J.-J., & Yang, A.-T. (2009). Structural Analysis of How Urban Form Impacts Travel Demand: Evidence from Taipei. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009106017

Maduwanthi, M., & Marasinghe, A. (2015, December). Factors Influencing to Travel Behavior on Transport Mode Choice. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-15-00044

Meyer, M. D., & Miller, E. J. (1984). Urban transportation planning: A Decision-Oriented Approach. https://trid.trb.org/view/207171

Miller, E. J., Roorda, M. J., & Carrasco, J. A. (2005). A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation, 32(4), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-7962-3

Peng, H., & Lu, H. (2007). Study on the Impacts of Urban Density on the Travel Demand Using GIS Spatial Analysis. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 7(4), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-6672(07)60033-6

Sharmeen, N. (2014). Development of a GIS-based model for optimum traffic flow distribution a case study on selected major routes of Dhaka City. http://lib.buet.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2935

Sun, B., Ermagun, A., & Dan, B. (2017). Built environmental impacts on commuting mode choice and distance: Evidence from Shanghai. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.001

Downloads

Published

30-12-2022

How to Cite

[1]
M. S. . Rana and M. . Ahmed, “EXPLORING IMPACTS OF URBAN DENSITY ON TRAVEL BEHAVIOR IN KHULNA CITY, BANGLADESH USING SPATIAL ANALYSIS”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 126–140, Dec. 2022.

Issue

Section

Science & Engineering