CHALLENGES OF ACCESSIBILITY FOR MARGINAL PEOPLE IN PRIVATELY OPERATED PUBLIC SPACE: LINEAR PARK, KHULNA AS A CASE

Antu  Das; Apurba Kumar  Sen; Nur Mohammad  Khan

doi:10.53808/KUS.2022.19.02.2143-se

Authors

Antu Das Architecture Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh
Apurba Kumar Sen Department of Architecture, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology-9203, Bangladesh
Nur Mohammad Khan Architecture Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2022.19.02.2143-se

Abstract

Apart from economic and environmental significance, public spaces have been argued to be one of the most important integrants of urban life for their social role. Nonetheless, a large number of public spaces in different contexts do not promote heterogeneity and lack in publicness. The exclusion of the marginal people from using public space has become a rising issue. However, built environmental design and management play significant roles in contributing to this exclusionary nature in state-owned but privately operated public spaces. To assess the extent and depth of exclusion, this study initially investigates the user condition of the park, who comes to the park, the number of visitors, and above all, the presence of marginal people. Later, with the indicators of accessibility, the study explores the shortcomings of design and management aspects, which are responsible for exclusion. This qualitative research employs a case study approach and uses observation and interview methods in the urban context of Bangladesh. Empirical data is collected from Linear Park in Khulna, a recently developed riverfront park by Khulna City Corporation (KCC) which is leased to a private organization. Findings from this study reveal that different roles of both public and private bodies are responsible for diminishing publicness in both development and use phases. Accordingly, design and management considerations for such urban parks need to be revised to ensure the public space is more comprehensive and inclusive to serve the diverse groups of people.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andersen, H. T., & Van Kempen, R. (2003). New trends in urban policies in Europe: evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark. Cities, 20(2), 77-86.

Andersson, C. (2021). Public space and the new urban agenda. In Public Space Reader (pp. 420-425). Routledge.

Atkinson, R. (2000). Combating social exclusion in Europe: the new urban policy challenge. Urban studies, 37(5-6), 1037-1055.

Badshah, A. A. (1996). Our urban future: new paradigms for equity and sustainability. London and New Jersey, 1.

Banerjee, T. (2001). The future of public space: beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American planning association, 67(1), 9-24.

Banerji, H., & Ekka, A. A. (2016). Designing Safer Cities-Review of Environmental Crime Prevention Strategies. GSTF Journal of Engineering Technology, 3(4), 25-32.

Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Population and Housing Census, Khulna, Bangladesh. Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, .

Barron, A. (2015). Age‐friendly seating and sense of place. Manchester City Council.

Benn, S. I., & Gaus, G. F. (1983). The public and the private: concepts and action. Public and private in social life, 3, 297-325.

Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Urban spaces-public places: The dimensions of urban design. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Carr, S., Stephen, C., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications. Inc.

De Magalhaes, C., & Trigo, S. F. (2017). Contracting out publicness: The private management of the urban public realm and its implications. Progress in Planning, 115, 1-28.

Doherty, J., Busch-Geertsema, V., Karpuskiene, V., Korhonen, J., O'Sullivan, E., Sahlin, I., . . . Wygnanska, J. (2008). Homelessness and exclusion: regulating public space in European cities. Surveillance & Society, 5(3).

Ekdi, F. P., & Çıracı, H. (2015). Really public? Evaluating the publicness of public spaces in Istanbul by means of fuzzy logic modelling. Journal of Urban Design, 20(5), 658-676.

Ercan, M. A. (2010). Less public than before? Public space improvement in Newcastle city centre. Routledge.

Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings (Vol. 23). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Gehl, J., & Gemzøe, L. (2001). New city spaces. Danish Architectural Press.

Getachew, A., Asnake, K., & Desta, H. (2022). Increasing the publicness of riversides as public space development on Kebena River, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research, 11(1), 1-14.

Katz, C. (2006). Power, space, and terror: Social reproduction and the public environment. The politics of public space, 185, 105-110.

Khaza, M. K. B., Rahman, M. M., Harun, F., & Roy, T. K. (2020). Accessibility and service quality of public parks in Khulna city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 146(3), 04020024.

Khulna City Corporation. (2021, October 12). "Basic Statistics". http://www.khulnacity.org/content/index.php?page=about_kcc&zwc&pid=30

Kohli, M., & Woodward, A. (2004). Inclusions and exclusions in European societies. Routledge.

Kohn, M. (2004). Brave new neighborhoods: The privatization of public space. Routledge.

Kurniawati, W. (2012). Public space for marginal people. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 476-484.

La Rosa, D. (2014). Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecological Indicators, 42, 122-134.

Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Banerjee, T. (1998). Urban design downtown: Poetics and politics of form. University of California Press.

Lynch, K. (1972). The Openness of Open Space.

Maciejko, A., & Czajka, R. (2019). Accessibility of the Open Public Space in Cities. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics,

Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Wiley.

Madanipour, A. (1999). Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(6), 879-891.

Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge.

Madanipour, A. (2010). Marginal public spaces in European cities. In Whose Public Space? (pp. 111-130). Routledge.

Madanipour, A. (2013). Whose public space?: International case studies in urban design and development. Routledge.

Marcus, C. C., & Francis, C. (1997). People places: design guidlines for urban open space. John Wiley & Sons.

Miao, P. (2011). Brave new city: Three problems in Chinese urban public space since the 1980s. Journal of Urban Design, 16(2), 179-207.

Micha, E. (2021). The public space of capitalist society: Acts of inclusion and exclusion. In School of Architecture (Vol. 2020-2021, pp. 10): National Technical University of Athens.

Mishu, M. R., Barua, U., & Stoican, I.-A. (2014). The changing nature of urban public places in Dhaka city. Urbanism. Architecture. Constructions/Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii, 5(4).

Moran, M. R., Rodríguez, D. A., Cotinez-O'Ryan, A., & Miranda, J. J. (2020). Park use, perceived park proximity, and neighborhood characteristics: Evidence from 11 cities in Latin America. Cities, 105, 102817.

National Recreation and Park Association. (2015). Safe Routes to Parks: Improving Access to Parks through Walkability.

Németh, J. (2012). Controlling the commons: how public is public space? Urban Affairs Review, 48(6), 811-835.

Németh, J., & Schmidt, S. (2007). Toward a methodology for measuring the security of publicly accessible spaces. Journal of the American planning association, 73(3), 283-297.

Németh, J., & Schmidt, S. (2011). The privatization of public space: modeling and measuring publicness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(1), 5-23.

Newman, O. (1973). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. Collier Books New York.

Niemelä, J. (2014). Ecology of urban green spaces: The way forward in answering major research questions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 298-303.

Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (1998). City centre management and safer city centres: approaches in Coventry and Nottingham. Cities, 15(2), 85-103.

Pasaogullari, N., & Doratli, N. (2004). Measuring accessibility and utilization of public spaces in Famagusta. Cities, 21(3), 225-232.

Rahman, K. A., & Zhang, D. (2018). Analyzing the level of accessibility of public urban green spaces to different socially vulnerable groups of people. Sustainability, 10(11), 3917.

Reyes, M., Páez, A., & Morency, C. (2014). Walking accessibility to urban parks by children: A case study of Montreal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 38-47.

Saxena, R., & Kamal, M. A. (2018). The impact of built environment on crime prevention and safety in schools: An environmental-behavior design guidelines approach. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 6(6), 260-270.

Schmidt, S., & Németh, J. (2010). Space, place and the city: Emerging research on public space design and planning. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 453-457.

Sorkin, M. (1992). Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. Macmillan.

Tabassum, S., & Sharmin, F. (2013). Accessibility analysis of parks at urban neighborhood: The case of Dhaka. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2(2), 48-61.

United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2020). Public space site-specific assessment: Guidelines to achieve quality public spaces at neighbourhood level. UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/public-space-site-specific-assessment-guidelines-to-achieve-quality-public-spaces-at-neighbourhood

Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234-244.

Yatmo, Y. A. (2008). Street vendors as ‘out of place’urban elements. Journal of Urban Design, 13(3), 387-402.

Yılmaz, M. (2018). Public space and accessibility. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning.

Zhang, X. (2017). Identifying consumerist privately owned public spaces: The ideal type of mass private property. Urban studies, 54(15), 3464-3479.