THE “MARBLE-HEARTED FIEND”: MATERIAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SPIRITUAL ASPECTS OF PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP IN KING LEAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2023.20.01.2231-ahKeywords:
Drama, parents, children, material concerns, psyche, spiritualityAbstract
The parent-child relationship is one of the most important subject matters in Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of King Lear in the sense that from it naturally spring the major themes of the play. Themes like regeneration of wisdom, distribution, and effect of power and pelf, human and divine justice, and man’s relationship with man and nature, are all presented on a universal scale, spatial and temporal, passing from the palace to the hovel, from the court to the heath, and from moments of folly to moments of enlightenment through moments of purgatorial sufferings. This universal scale can be regarded as connected to the political contexts of Britain, modeled on the prototypical and primary unit of a family. And since family, which involves principally the begetter and the begotten that also has the potential of begetting, is the primary and fundamental unit of the whole universe from both human and animal perspectives of life, this paper seeks to investigate how the familial background of the parent-child relationship in King Lear is portrayed against the backdrop of the kingdom and the universe. In order to do so, these three units – family, kingdom, and in natural and metaphysical senses the universe – are considered to be deeply interconnected with human relationships, corresponding consecutively to its psychological, material, and spiritual aspects. Shakespeare has illuminated the tragic truths about the relationship between the parents and their children by showing a profound interaction between the family, kingdom, and the universe with respect to their corresponding psychological, material, and spiritual aspects.
Downloads
References
Bradley, A. C. (1992). Shakespearean tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth (3rd ed.). Macmillan Education (Original work published 1904).
Cantor, P. A. (2008). The cause of thunder: nature and justice in King Lear. In J. Kahan (Ed.), King Lear: New critical essays (pp. 231-252). Routledge.
Chambers. R. W. (1940). King Lear: the first W. P. Ker memorial lecture delivered in the university of Glasgow, 27th November, 1939. Jackson, Son & Company.
Chaplin, W. H. (1969). Form and psychology in King Lear. Literature and Psychology, 19(3-4), 31–46.
Craig, L. (2001). Of philosophers and kings: Political philosophy in Shakespeare’s Macbeth and King Lear. University of Toronto Press.
Danby, J. F. (1948). Shakespeare’s Doctrine of Nature: A study of King Lear. Faber & Faber.
Daniel, G. (2019). Family dramas: Intimacy, power and systems in Shakespeare’s tragedies. Routledge.
Davies O. F. (2017). Shakespeare’s fathers and daughters (The Arden Shakespeare). Bloomsbury.
Dreher, D. (1986). Domination and defiance: fathers and daughters in Shakespeare. University Press of Kentucky.
Elton, W. R. (1980). King Lear and the gods. University Press of Kentucky.
Empson, W. (1952). The structure of complex words. Chatto & Windus.
Greenblatt, G. (1985). Shakespeare and the exorcists. In P. Parker & G. Hartman (Eds.), Shakespeare and the question of theory (pp. 163-187). Methuen.
Hadfield, A. (2003). The Power and rights of the crown in Hamlet and King Lear: ‘The king— the king’s to blame’. The Review of English Studies, 54(217), 566-586. https://doi.org/10.1093/res/54.217.566
Halio, J. L. (Ed.). (2005). The tragedy of King Lear. Cambridge University Press.
Harbage, A. (1964). King Lear: An introduction. In A. Harbage (Ed.), Shakespeare: The tragedies (pp. 113-122). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Heilman, R. B. (1963). This great stage: Image and structure in King Lear. University of Washington Press.
Hess, N. (1987). King Lear and some anxieties of old age. British Journal of Medical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1987.tb02733.x
Holiday, D. A. (2018). Cordelia’s moral incapacity in King Lear. In G. L. Hagberg (Ed.), Stanley Cavell on aesthetic understanding (pp. 75-108). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97466-8_4
Jaffa, H. V. (1957). The limits of politics: An interpretation of King Lear, act 1, scene 1. American Political Science Review, 51(2), 405-427. American Political Science Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952200
James, D.G. (1951). The dream of learning: An essay on The advancement of learning, Hamlet, and King Lear. Oxford University Press.
Kahn, P. (2000). Law and love: The trials of King Lear. Yale University Press.
Klevar, H. L. (1972, Winter). The unnatural nuptial breach. Shakespeare Quarterly, 23(1), 117-121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2868665
Knight, G. W. (1936). Principles of Shakespearean production with especial reference to the tragedies. Faber & Faber.
Knight, G. W. (1949). The wheel of fire: Interpretations of Shakespearian tragedy with three new essays (4th ed.). Methuen & Co. Ltd.
Knights, L.C. (1960). Some Shakespearean themes. Stanford University Press.
Kott, J. (1965). King Lear, or endgame. In Shakespeare, our contemporary (pp.100-153). Routledge.
Lings, M. (2006). Shakespeare’s window into the soul: the mystical wisdom in Shakespeare’s characters. Inner Traditions.
Linley, K. (2015). King Lear in context: The cultural background. Anthem Press.
Lowenthal, D. (1997). Shakespeare and the good life: Ethics and politics in dramatic form. Rowman & Littlefield.
Mack, M. (1993). “We came crying hither”: King Lear. In Everybody’s Shakespeare: Reflections chiefly on the tragedies (pp. 151-181). Nebraska University Press.
McLaughlin, J. J. (1978). The dynamics of power in King Lear: An Adlerian interpretation. Shakespeare Quarterly, 29(1), 37-43, Oxford University Press.
Moseley, C. (1988). Trial and judgement: the trial scenes in King Lear. In L. Cookson & B. Loughrey (Eds.), Critical essays on King Lear (pp. 65–75). Longman.
Muir, K. (1963). William Shakespeare: the great tragedies: Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Longmans.
Schwarz, K. (2011). What you will: Gender, contract, and Shakespearean social space. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Sewell, A. (1951). Character and society in Shakespeare. Clarendon Press.
Shakespeare, W. (2005). The tragedy of King Lear (J. L. Halio, Ed.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1623)
Snyder, S. (1982, Winter). King Lear and the psychology of dying. Shakespeare Quarterly, 33(4), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870125
Stampfer, J. (1960). The catharsis of King Lear. Shakespeare Survey, 13, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521064260
Stern, J. (1990, Autumn). King Lear: The transference of the kingdom. Shakespeare Quarterly, 41 (3), 299- 308. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2870480
Tillyard, E. M. W. (1952). The Elizabethan world picture. Chatto & Windus.
Wilson, J. D. (1929). Six tragedies of Shakespeare: An introduction for the plain man. Longmans, Green & Co.
Young, B. W. (2009). Family life in the age of Shakespeare. Greenwood Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Khulna University Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
