Comparative Analysis of Biophilic and Non-Biophilic Hostel Designs in a Tropical Climate: A case of University of Ibadan, Nigeria

Authors

  • Joel Taiwo Department of Architecture, University of Ibadan
  • Olufunmilola O. Obakin Department of Architecture, University of Ibadan
  • Adeola S. Ajayi Department of Architecture, University of Ibadan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2025.22.02.1406-se

Keywords:

Biophilic Elements, Tropical Buildings, Comfort, Indoor, Eco-Friendly

Abstract

Various strategies have been implemented to alleviate the effects of ozone layer depletion on household comfort in both tropical and other climates. Some approaches focus on building structures, while others investigate the airspace between roofing and ceilings, and some embrace biophilic elements. However, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of biophilic elements, particularly in tropical regions like Nigeria, which this study aims to address. This research explores a comparative analysis of biophilic and non-biophilic hostel designs in a tropical climate, specifically at the University of Ibadan. The objective is to compare environmental parameters between biophilic and non-biophilic hostels in the study area. To achieve this, indoor air temperatures for high biophilic design (IT-HBD) and non-biophilic design (IT-NBD) were measured using K-type thermometers in accordance with ASTM E1 and E77 standards. Concurrently, indoor relative humidity for high biophilic design (IRH-HBD) and non-biophilic design (IRH-NBD) was measured using a digital psychrometer based on ISO 14644-16 standards.

Data were analyzed statistically using graphical representation and a t-test at p<0.05. The indoor air temperatures for IT-HBD in the morning, afternoon, and evening were 29.9-27.9°C, 37.1-31.4°C, and 35.4-24.3°C, respectively, indicating high moisture content in the air, which leads to lower temperatures due to the influence of biophilic elements. In contrast, IT-NBD recorded temperatures of 32.5-30.5°C, 37.5-32.6°C, and 35.4-29.3°C, showing lower humidity and resulting in higher indoor temperatures. Similarly, IRH-HBD ranged from 60% to 77%, 55% to 65%, and 60% to 69%, indicating adequate moisture for indoor cooling. Conversely, IRH-NBD ranged from 60% to 68%, 55% to 64%, and 51% to 63%, reflecting lower humidity levels that contribute to higher temperatures. The statistical analysis revealed that the mean air temperature for NBD (Mean = 32.35, SD = 2.37) is significantly higher than that of HBD (Mean = 29.50, SD = 3.53).Comparatively, incorporating high biophilic elements in hostel design provides substantial benefits over non-biophilic designs. Therefore, designing residences with biophilic features can greatly enhance comfort in buildings. The findings of this study contribute valuable insights into how indoor comfort can be achieved through biophilic elements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assari, M. & Tajarloo, S. (2021). The Effects of Biophilic Design on People’s Psychological Outcomes: A Review of Literature. Research & Reviews: Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 9(5), 1-18.

Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., Clancy, J. O., & Andrews, S. L. 2014. Biophilic design: a review and analysis of the theory, benefits and practices. International Journal of Architectural Research 8(2): 62-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v8i2.436

Cox, D. T., Shanahan, D. F., Hudson, H. L., Fuller, R. A., Anderson, K., Hancock, S., & Gaston, K.J. 2017. Doses of nearby nature simultaneously associated with multiple health benefits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14(2): 172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020172

David J. Nowak 2020; Urban Trees, Air Quality and Human Health. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Syracuse, New York. 1 -25

David J. Nowak and Gordon M. Heisler 2010; Air Quality Effects of Urban Trees and Parks, United State of Department of Agriculture, USA.

Deryn Davidson (2013). Integrating Biophilic Principles and Therapeutic Design Elements in Outdoor Spaces for Children at Tucson Medical Center.

Edward O. Wilson (2015). The Economics of Biophilia, Why Designing with Nature in Mind Makes Financial Sense. Terrapin Bright Green.

Eludoyin, O. M., Adelekan, I. O., Webster, R. and Eludoyin, A. O. (2014). Air temperature, relative humidity, climate regionalization and thermal comfort of Nigeria. International Journal of Climatology. 34 (6), pp. 2000-2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3817

Frederick Law Olmsted, William Browning, Catherine Ryan and Joseph Clancy (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design, improving health and well-being in the built environment. Introduction to Yosemite and the Mariposa Grove: A Preliminary Report.

Fuad H. Mallick, (1996). Thermal comfort and building design in the tropical climates, Energy and Buildings, Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 161-167, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(95)00940-X

Jelena P. Đekić, Petar B. Mitković, Milena M. Dinić Branković, Milica Z. Igić, Petar S. Đekić, Mihailo P. Mitković (2018). The Study of Effects of Greenery on Temperature Reduction in Urban Areas. Thermal Science 2018(00):122-122. DOI: 10.2298/TSCI170530122D DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI170530122D

Kellert, S. R., & Calabrese, E. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. In Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Eds. J. Heerwagen, M. Mador. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley., 73-117.

Kong, F., Yin, H., James, P., & Hutyra, L. R. 2019. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning 135: 149-158.

M. A. Chagolla, G. Alvarez, E. Simá, R. Tovar, G. Huelsz (2012). Effect of tree shading on the thermal load of a house in a warm climate zone in Mexico. Conference Paper • November 2012 DOI: 10.1115/IMECE2012-87918. Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition IMECE2012 November 9-15, 2012, Houston, Texas, USA.

Mohannad Bayoumi, (2017). Energy saving method for improving thermal comfort and air quality in warm humid climates using isothermal high velocity ventilation, Renewable Energy, Volume 114, Part B. Pages 502-512, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.056

Omaga, A. E. & Lateef, A. L. (2023). Biophilic design strategies in healthcare buildings. International Journal of Environmental Research & Earth Science Published by Cambridge Research, 27(4), 69-84.

Rania EI Messeidy (2019). Application of Biophilic Patterns in Health Care Environments to Enhance Healing. Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, October University for Modern Science and Arts (MSA), Cairo, Egypt. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/erj.2019.122518

So¨derlund, J., & Newman, P. (2015). Biophilic architecture: a review of the rationale and outcomes. AIMS Environ. Sci. 2, 950e969. Somarakis, G., Stagakis, S., Chrysoulakis, N., 2019. ThinkNature Nature-Based Solutions Handbook. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2015.4.950

Stephen R. Kellert, and Elizabeth F. Calabrese (2015). The Practice of Biophilic Design.

T Safikhani, AM Abdullah, DR Ossen, M Baharvand (2014). A review of energy characteristic of vertical greenery systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 40, 450-462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.166

Ting Cheng and Azizan Marzuki (2023). Investigating the Influence of Introducing Biophilic Elements into the Shopping Mall Environment: Perception of Public Visitors. Journal of Sustainability Research. School of Housing and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Weigje Zhong, Torsten Schroder, and Juliette Bekkering (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Architectural Design and Engineering, Department of the Built Environment, University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Frontiers of Architectural research 11, 114 – 141.

White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., & Depledge, M. H. 2010. Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports 6(1): 1-11.

Zhong, W., Schröder, T. W. A., & Bekkering, J. D. (2022). Biophilic Design in Architecture and Its Contributions to Health, Well-being, and Sustainability: A Critical Review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006

Downloads

Published

12-11-2025

How to Cite

[1]
J. Taiwo, O. O. Obakin, and A. S. Ajayi, “Comparative Analysis of Biophilic and Non-Biophilic Hostel Designs in a Tropical Climate: A case of University of Ibadan, Nigeria”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 113–125, Nov. 2025.

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.