AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

Authors

  • Muhammad Azizul Islam Business Administration Discipline, School of Business, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
  • Mohammad Istiaq Azim Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business Studies, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2000.2.2.0058-mb

Keywords:

Auditor; Independence; Financial statement; True and fair view; Compliance

Abstract

Independence is the keystone of the audit profession; without independence, the users of financial statements would not be able to rely on the auditor’s report. Auditor independence in developing countries is important since the auditor by providing credibility to financial statements facilitates the allocation of scarce capital resources in financial and capital markets. The concept of independence is not absolute; no auditors can claim complete independence of a client. Rather, independence is relative - a matter of degree. In this paper we will try to give a summarized picture of Auditor’s Independence in different countries.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants), 1987.The Accounting Profession in the United Kingdom, AICPA, New York,

Albrecht, W.S., Marsh, H.L. and Bentzel, F.H., 1988. Auditing on international subsidiary, The Internal Auditor, Vol. 45, October, pp. 22-6.

Anderson, J. and Keenan, D., 1990. The companies act 1989: auditing aspects, Accountancy, Vol. 105, March 1990 pp. 98-106.

Chapman, C., 1995a. Swedish public authorities to follow IIA standards. Internal Auditor, December, p. 8.

Chapman, C., 1995b. International accounting standards timetable set, Internal Auditor, December, p. 8.

Ernst and Whinney, 1987. The Accounting Profession in the Netherlands. AICPA, New York.

Ernst and Young, 1994. The Accounting Profession in Denmark, AICPA, New York.

Forster, K.P. and Svensson, E., 1987. The Accounting Profession in Sweden. AICPA, New York.

Forster, K.P., 1987. The Accounting Profession in Australia, AICPA, New York.

Jensen, H.L., 1995. Internal auditing in Hong Kong, Internal Auditing, p. 57.

McKinnon, J., 1984.Cultural constraints on audit independence in Japan. The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 20, pp. 17-43.

Price Waterhouse, 1990. Doing Business in Spain.Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Price Waterhouse, 1991.Doing Business in the Russian Federation. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL

Price Waterhouse, 1992a.Doing Business in Switzerland. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Price Waterhouse, 1992b. Doing Business in Argentina. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Price Waterhouse, 1992c. Doing Business in the People’s Republic of China. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Price Waterhouse, 1993a.Doing Business in New Zealand. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Price Waterhouse, 1993b.Doing Business in France. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Price Waterhouse, 1993c.Doing Business in Japan. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Price Waterhouse, 1993d.Improving Audit Committee Performance: What Works Best. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Altamonte Springs, FL.

Price Waterhouse, 1994a.Doing Business in Canada. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Price Waterhouse, 1994b.Doing Business in Malaysia. Price Waterhouse, Chicago, IL.

Stevenson, J., 1995.Why isn’t internal audit on the audit agenda? Management Accounting, April, pp. 12-13.

Downloads

Published

29-11-2000

How to Cite

[1]
M. A. . Islam and M. I. . Azim, “AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 363–370, Nov. 2000.

Issue

Section

Management and Business Studies

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.