Access to Justice through District Legal Aid Office (DLAO): Addressing Barriers of the Informal Justice System in Bangladesh

Authors

  • Shahriaz Ahmmed Development Studies Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna-9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2024.21.02.1210-ss

Keywords:

Access to justice, District Legal Aid Office (DLAO), informal justice system, Shalish, ADR Mediation.

Abstract

Access to justice enables individuals, to challenge discrimination, protect their rights, resolve disputes, and demand accountability from authorities. The formidable barriers within the formal legal system in Bangladesh often restrict access for the marginalized and disadvantaged groups, prompting them to turn to informal systems for dispute resolution. However, different institutional, socio-economic, and socio-cultural barriers impede their pursuit of justice within the informal system as well. In 2014, government of Bangladesh issued a gazette notification allowing the District Legal Aid Office (DLAO) to resolve disputes through ADR mediation. With a qualitative approach, this study explores whether DLAO has been able to address the barriers of the informal justice systems and improve access to justice for all. This study found that DLAO has been most successful in overcoming the institutional barriers within informal justice systems by effectively addressing marginalization of women’s voices, corruption, and lack of accountability through equitable, collaborative mediation. The persistent fear of reprisal and limited legal awareness among the public indicates DLAO’s effectiveness in overcoming socio-cultural barriers remains comparatively low. Additionally, this study suggests that DLAO has moderate effectiveness in tackling socio-economic barriers. If existing challenges of DLAO can be addressed, this model of justice delivery could significantly enhance access to justice, especially for women and the underprivileged in developing countries like Bangladesh.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, J., & Von Wangenheim, G. (2021). Access to justice: An evaluation of the informal justice systems. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 5(1), 228-244. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.lassij/5.1.16

Ahmed, B., & Islam, T. (2013). The Role of Union Parishad in Rural Dispute Resolution in Bangladesh: an Evaluation in the Light of People’s Perception. Studies on Asia, 4(3), 188-210.

Akram, M. S. (2017). A critical analysis of access to justice in Bangladesh. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6(8), 50-58.

Alim, M.A., & Ali, T.O. (2007), Ngo-shalish and justice-seeking behaviour in rural Bangladesh. BRAC, BRAC Research Report.

Ameen, N., (2004). The Legal Aid Act, 2000: implementation of government legal aid versus NGO legal aid. Dhaka Univ. Stud. Part F, 15, p.59.

Anderson, M. R. (2003). Access to justice and legal process: Making legal institutions responsive to poor people in LDCs (IDS Working Paper No. 178). Institute of Development Studies.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Decker, K., Sage, C. and Stefanova, M., (2005). Law or justice: Building equitable legal institutions.

de Langen, M.S. and Barendrecht, M., (2009). Legal Empowerment of the poor: Innovating access to justice. THE STATE OF ACCESS: SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF DEMOCRACIES TO CREATE EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES, Gowher Rizvi and Jorrit de Jong, eds, 250-271.

Golub, S., (2003). Non-state justice systems in Bangladesh and the Philippines. United Kingdom Department of International Development.

Golub, S., (2010). What is legal empowerment? An introduction. Legal empowerment: practitioners’ perspectives, 2.

Haq, M. N., Ferdous, J., & Das, R. C. (2021). Effectiveness of Arbitration as an Alternative Dispute Resolution in Bangladesh. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 2(1), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v2i1.20876

Hartman, A. C., Blair, R. A., & Blattman, C. (2021). Engineering informal institutions: Long-run impacts of alternative dispute resolution on violence and property rights in Liberia. The Journal of Politics, 83(1), 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1086/709431

Hasle, L. (2003). Too poor for rights? Access to justice for poor women in Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 29(3/4): 99-136.

Hassan, A. B. M., & Malek, M. A. (2019). ADR Mechanisms in Bangladesh: Widening Scopes for Access to Justice. EBAUB Journal of Law, 1.

Islam, M. J., Suzuki, M., & Mazumder, N. (2024). Promoting access to justice in Bangladesh: Towards a hybrid justice model. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 77, 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100655

Islam, M. S. (2011). Efficiency and effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution schemes towards the promotion of access to justice in Bangladesh. IIUC STUDIES. 8, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.3329/iiucs.v8i0.20405

Islam, M. S., & Alam, M. S. (2018). Access to Justice in Rural Bangladesh: A Review on Village Court and its Effectiveness. Department of Government and Politics, 31.

Jahan, E. (2015). Legal Aid in Bangladesh: Application and Commitment. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 4(2), 2-3.

Jayasundere, R. (2012). Access to justice assessments in the Asia Pacific: A review of experiences and tools from the region. Bangkok, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Regional Centre, United Nations Development Programme.

Kolisetty, A. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of legal empowerment as a pathway out of poverty: A case study of BRAC (Justice and Development Working Paper Series, No. 26). The World Bank.

Larisa, Z., & Svetlana, R. (2014). Mediation and legal assistance. Russian Law Journal, 2(2), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2014-2-2-145-156

Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative research journal, 19(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012

Mollah, M. A. I. (2016). Administration of State sponsored local justice system: An appraisal on the legal framework of Village Courts in Bangladesh. International Journal of Legal Information, 44(3), 235-240. doi:10.1017/jli.2016.36

New York State Unified Court System. (2014). Community Dispute Resolution Centers Program: 2013-2014 annual report. https://ww2.nycourts.gov/sites/default/files/document/files/2018-07/AnnualReport_2013-14.pdf

Pablo, J. (2024). Effectiveness of Mediation and Arbitration as Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods in Mexico. Journal of Conflict Management, 4(1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.47604/jcm.2383

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42, 533-544.

Panday, P. K., & Rabbani, G. (2017). Do legal empowerment activities of NGOs reduce gender-based violence in Bangladesh?. International Journal of Gender Studies in Developing Societies, 2(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGSDS.2017.085594

Patil, D. (2015). A Critical Analysis on Lok-Adalat in India. Research Front, 3(2), 56-59.

Ponelis, S. R. (2015). Using interpretive qualitative case studies for exploratory research in doctoral studies: A case of information systems research in small and medium enterprises. International journal of doctoral studies, 10, 535. https://doi.org/10.28945/2339

Downloads

Published

04-12-2024

How to Cite

[1]
S. Ahmmed, “Access to Justice through District Legal Aid Office (DLAO): Addressing Barriers of the Informal Justice System in Bangladesh ”, Khulna Univ. Stud., pp. 284–294, Dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.