Implementing English as Medium of Instruction at the Bangladeshi Universities:—Policies, and Potentials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2026.23.01.1337-ahKeywords:
EMI, Language Policy, L2/FL, English as International Language, Agency-StructureAbstract
This paper focuses on the policies for, and potentials of implementing English as a medium of instruction (EMI) at the universities in Bangladesh. There are 109 private and 53 public universities in Bangladesh as of 17 October, 2022—and the figures are on ever increase for both. While all the private universities opt for EMI at the policy level, some public universities keep the options open for both Bangla and English as the Medium of Instruction (MoI). Ideally, the technical subjects, such as, Science and Technology, Engineering, BBA, English, etc. require teaching employing English as a medium in both contexts. However, the realities are far away from the ideals, and there are gaps between policy directives and practices in the private universities too. Against this backdrop, this paper addresses some critical questions such as: What problems do learners face to get educated in EMI or in mixed Bangla and English instruction? What challenges do the teachers encounter while delivering lectures in English? How do the job markets, socio-economic valuations of English, tertiary education etc. influence such English-in-Education policies in Bangladesh? The agency-structure perspective (as articulated by Liddicoat & Taylor-Leech, 2020) was employed as a theoretical position to explore the above questions. The investigation being exploratory in nature, and following a qualitative approach, we analyzed relevant policy documents (i.e., education policies of Bangladesh) and collected data through interviews. Our findings show that despite some challenges in implementing EMI policies, both teachers and learners feel it is necessary to have an explicit EMI policy for Bangladeshi tertiary educational institutes, especially for the public universities. Moreover, the provision of translanguaging is strongly recommended in line with the spirit of the findings and discussions.
Downloads
References
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1),109–137. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109.
Ali, L. H. (2013b). Language policy and planning in Malaysia: Managing English-medium instruction at tertiary level (Unpublished PhD dissertation). The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Badwan, K. (2021). Agency in educational language planning: perspectives from higher education in Tunisia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 99-116.
Ball, S. J. (2005). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. Routledge.
Banu, R. Sussex, R. (2001). English in Bangladesh after independence: dynamics of policy and practice. In Who is Centric Now? The Present State of Post-Colonial Englishes. Edited by: Moore B. Oxford University Press, Melbourne;122–147.
Cho, D. W. (2012). English-medium instruction in the university context of Korea: Trade off between teaching outcomes and media-initiated university ranking. Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(4).
Chowdhury, R. (2003). International TESOL training and EFL contexts: the cultural disillusionment factor. Australian Journal of Education, 47(3):283–302.
Chowdhury, R., Farooqui, S. (2011). Teacher training and teaching practice: the changing landscape of ELT in secondary education in Bangladesh. In English Language Education in South Asia: From Policy to Pedagogy. Edited by: Farrell L, Singh UN, Giri RA. Cambridge University Press, Delhi; 147–159.
Chowdhury, R., & Kabir, A. H. (2014). Language wars: English education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Multilingual Education, 4(1), 21.
Chowdhury R, Le Ha P. (2008). Towards locally sensitive and meaningful pedagogy in ELT: Bangladeshi perspectives. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(3):305–316.
Costa, F., & Coleman, J. A. (2013). A survey of English-medium instruction in Italian higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(1), 3–19.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2011). Internationalisation, multilingualism and English medium instruction. World Englishes, 30(3), 345–359.
Erling, Elizabeth & Seargeant, Philip & Solly, Mike & Chowdhury, Hasan & Rahman, Sayeedur. (2012). Attitudes to English as a language for international development in rural Bangladesh.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press.
Hamid, M. O., Jahan, I., & Islam, M. M. (2013). Medium of instruction policies and language practices, ideologies and institutional divides: Voices of teachers and students in a private university in Bangladesh. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 144-163.
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. na.
Kachru, B.B. (1998). English as an Asian language. Links and letters, 5: 89–108.
Liddicoat, A. J., & Taylor-Leech, K. (2021). Agency in language planning and policy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 1-18.
Lin, A.M. Y., & Martin, P. W. (2005). From a critical deconstruction paradigm to a critical construction paradigm: An introduction to decolonisation, globalisation and language-in education policy and practice. In A. M. Y. Lin & P.W. Martin (Eds.), Decolonisation, globalisation: Language-in education policy and practice (pp. 1–19). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Miller, R. A. (1977). The Japanese Language in Contemporary Japan: Some Socio-Linguistic Observation. Stanford
Bangladesh Shikkha Commission Report [Bangladesh Education Commission Report]. (1974). Ministry of Education, Dhaka.
Bangladesh Jatiyo Shikkha Commission Report [Bangladesh National Education Commission Report]. (1988). Ministry of Education, Dhaka.
Jatiyo shikkha nity [National Education Policy]. (2000). Ministry of Education, Dhaka.
Shikkha Biseshoggo Committee Protibedon [Education Expert Committee Report]. (2002). Ministry of Education, Dhaka.
Jatiyo Shikkha Commission Protibedon [National Education Commission Report]. (2004). Ministry of Education, Dhaka.
National Education Policy 2010. (2010). Ministry of Education, Dhaka.
Rahman, M. (2010). Improving the Relevance of Humanities Higher Education in Bangladesh. Monash University, Melbourne.
Roshid, M. M. (2014). Pragmatic strategies of ELF speakers: a case study in international business communication. Enacting English Across Borders: Critical Studies in the Asia Pacific, ed. Raqib Chowdhury and Roby Marlina, 4571.
Rassool, N. (2007). Global issues in language, education and development: Perspectives from postcolonial countries. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Shouhui, Z., & Baldauf Jr, R. B. (2012). Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(1), 1-24.
Tollefson, J. W. (2015). Historical‐Structural 13 Analysis. Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide, 7, 140.
Tsui, A. B. M., & Tollefson, J. W. (Eds.). (2007). Language policy, culture and identity in Asian contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khulna University Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.