THE EFFECTS OF STARBUCK’S EXCESSIVE GREED: AN ECOCRITICAL STUDY OF MOBY-DICK

Sheikh Shareeful  Islam; Ahmed  Ahsanuzzaman

doi:10.53808/KUS.2017.14.1and2.1633-A

Authors

Sheikh Shareeful Islam English Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh
Ahmed Ahsanuzzaman English Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna 9208, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53808/KUS.2017.14.1and2.1633-A

Keywords:

Animal studies, anthropocentrism, ecocritical, human-nature relationship, Starbuck

Abstract

Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick, a whaling story at the surface, wrenches out from its confines the deep-seated dilemma in human–nature relationship. Like all the other characters, Starbuck, the ship’s first mate, has a loosely bound but matter–of–fact association to Moby Dick, the white whale. His attitude towards Moby Dick is one of what he holds as a general outlook towards a whale. Unlike Captain Ahab, he is not obsessed with that particular animal. He commoditizes it, and thereby takes an anthropocentric stance as he sets himself on a mission to hunt down the great beast. The questions, however, remain whether his approach towards the whale(s) is justifiable and whether the counterstrike that he, together with his shipmates, faces in the end of the novel has any connection to such an approach or not. This paper intends to address such issues from the perspective of animal studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Crosby, D. A. (2002). A religion of nature. New York, NY: State University of New York Press

Deane-Drummond, C. E. (2004). The ethics of nature. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and society: An introduction to human-animal studies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Fairbanks, S. J. (2010). Environmental goodness and the challenge of American culture.Ethics and the Environment,15(2), 79-102

Garrard, G. (2004). Ecocriticism. New York, NY: Routledge.

Guo, H. (2009). Vengeance, indifference, and concern: The ethical interpretation of mannature relations in Moby-Dick. Journal of Cambridge Studies,4(4), 136-146.

Kalof, L. & Fitzgerald, A. (2003). Reading the trophy: Exploring the display of dead animals in hunting magazines.Visual Studies,18(2), 112-122.

Melville, H. (2004). Moby-Dick. (H. Parker& H. Hayford, Eds.). (2nd ed.). New York, NY:Norton.

Nayar, P. K. (2014). Posthumanism. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

Preece, R. & Fraser, D. (2000). The status of animals in Biblical and Christian thought: A study in colliding value. Society and Animals, 8(3), 245-263.

Yan, Y. (2011). The call of the wild: An ecocritical reading of The Old Man and the Sea.Canadian Social Science, 7(3), 167-175.